"Everyone shall contribute to public expenditure because of their ability to pay.
The tax system is based on criteria of progressiveness"
Fathers constituents, the more clear than this could not be!
"The tax system is based on criteria of progressivity", warned in simple, bare and lapidary.
We would have expected, in the sixty years that followed, a strong commitment of the Italian ruling class aimed at eliminating or at least to mitigate all forms of deviation from the regulatory requirement constitutional.
be taken so that the constitutional provision does not distinguish, not without reason, between direct and indirect contribution, but here "falls ass" excise duties, stamp duties, fees, VAT, etc.., Play, in fact, the tax system, a most obvious function of drainage from the weaker sections of Italian taxpayers than the wealthy, in inverse proportion to ability to pay! To the extent that one can safely say without fear of contradiction, to paraphrase the first article of the Constitution, that the Italian Republic "is based on the poor"! and ... does not seem an exaggeration.
Meanwhile, let me refute a claim applicant is not true, according to the letter of the Constitution and that there are groups of citizens "exempt from paying taxes."
The Constitution, as noted above, does not distinguish between direct and indirect contributions, and those citizens who are exempted states, because of their minimal income from the payment of taxes, in reality, they are only for the income tax, but pay, and how!, all other "heavy taxes" in exactly the same as far richer, and so enduring, proportion, a burden greater the smaller is their ability to pay, spending, saving, spending power and savings that is, progressively decreasing.
I clear the complexity of the problem, but it affects the realization that nothing is done when you do not do the opposite, for I do not say eliminate, but at least minimize the extent of the phenomenon. Phenomenon that clearly contributes to that trend, endemic in our country, to expand "the gap" between poor, who are getting poorer and the rich who get richer (and, in key geographical, of course, also between north and south ).
In a nutshell, I forgive you "extreme examples", a "no income", "to eat", "for a living," contribute to "public expenditure" (Constitutional phrase which stands for "taxes"), at least to the extent provided for VAT on food, the father of a family whose income is subject to direct taxation at a rate of 23%, in fact, contributes to the same charges for a percentile amount no less (who is better than me, proves otherwise ...) 43% (actually more!). When it comes to tax burden
... What, then, can be, in the eyes of so much of people, the image of a country which, like a giant parasite absorbs everything, almost to kill its host.
That bitterness, to listen to speeches by vacuous vacuous characters and see them intent to dispute turned on the sex of angels, listen to successful leaders of the party, and parliamentarians and ministers, questioning the separation, increasingly, the people from politics ... What
bitterness, all the bombastic speeches and those cervellottiche analysis: after all, among the gifts necessary that a good ruler must have, surely, there is common sense, which gives him the ability to understand the real problems (and simple) of his people (< boni pastoris pecus round them, not deglubere !> already warned Suetonius, 2,000 years ago).
But it is so difficult, in our democratic republic, seek to give effect to its fundamental law, the Constitution, and build a "system" means a State, it consistently?
Nunzio Dibiase
The tax system is based on criteria of progressiveness"
Fathers constituents, the more clear than this could not be!
"The tax system is based on criteria of progressivity", warned in simple, bare and lapidary.
We would have expected, in the sixty years that followed, a strong commitment of the Italian ruling class aimed at eliminating or at least to mitigate all forms of deviation from the regulatory requirement constitutional.
be taken so that the constitutional provision does not distinguish, not without reason, between direct and indirect contribution, but here "falls ass" excise duties, stamp duties, fees, VAT, etc.., Play, in fact, the tax system, a most obvious function of drainage from the weaker sections of Italian taxpayers than the wealthy, in inverse proportion to ability to pay! To the extent that one can safely say without fear of contradiction, to paraphrase the first article of the Constitution, that the Italian Republic "is based on the poor"! and ... does not seem an exaggeration.
Meanwhile, let me refute a claim applicant is not true, according to the letter of the Constitution and that there are groups of citizens "exempt from paying taxes."
The Constitution, as noted above, does not distinguish between direct and indirect contributions, and those citizens who are exempted states, because of their minimal income from the payment of taxes, in reality, they are only for the income tax, but pay, and how!, all other "heavy taxes" in exactly the same as far richer, and so enduring, proportion, a burden greater the smaller is their ability to pay, spending, saving, spending power and savings that is, progressively decreasing.
I clear the complexity of the problem, but it affects the realization that nothing is done when you do not do the opposite, for I do not say eliminate, but at least minimize the extent of the phenomenon. Phenomenon that clearly contributes to that trend, endemic in our country, to expand "the gap" between poor, who are getting poorer and the rich who get richer (and, in key geographical, of course, also between north and south ).
In a nutshell, I forgive you "extreme examples", a "no income", "to eat", "for a living," contribute to "public expenditure" (Constitutional phrase which stands for "taxes"), at least to the extent provided for VAT on food, the father of a family whose income is subject to direct taxation at a rate of 23%, in fact, contributes to the same charges for a percentile amount no less (who is better than me, proves otherwise ...) 43% (actually more!). When it comes to tax burden
... What, then, can be, in the eyes of so much of people, the image of a country which, like a giant parasite absorbs everything, almost to kill its host.
That bitterness, to listen to speeches by vacuous vacuous characters and see them intent to dispute turned on the sex of angels, listen to successful leaders of the party, and parliamentarians and ministers, questioning the separation, increasingly, the people from politics ... What
bitterness, all the bombastic speeches and those cervellottiche analysis: after all, among the gifts necessary that a good ruler must have, surely, there is common sense, which gives him the ability to understand the real problems (and simple) of his people (< boni pastoris pecus round them, not
But it is so difficult, in our democratic republic, seek to give effect to its fundamental law, the Constitution, and build a "system" means a State, it consistently?
Nunzio Dibiase
Source: http://www.circolopoliticopitagora.it/ (Circle Political Pythagoras Bernalda)
0 comments:
Post a Comment