I must have missed some step the history of relations between the left post-communist and "radical." Well, to me that they were the only ones in the history of the last 90 years in this country have continued to battle right to freedom and reform, the only ones who have walked the path of the construction of a sinister "other" liberal liberal, anti-prohibitionist, and libertarian. The former
PCI or PdCI or DS, which is:
Although the walls have fallen, despite the towers demolished, despite the referendum on proposals for radical "alternative" voted with favorable results, with the repeal of 80 percent or 90% and thanks to vote in favor of citizens who voted then maybe DC or PCI, despite the world, the scenarios, the company mutate ... it seems that this country, the hopes for this country to have a left finally "liberated" and liberal, should pay the cost of having had the Communist Party's strongest western world, the PCI, in fact. I mean it's the same concept of the role of the individual, society and the party that has led and leads, the DS now, the PCI in the past, and have determined to cause a degree in Italian history, a "present" e. .. Alas I fear they are on the road to establishing a certain
"future", not alone but with its allies, much mocked, then as now, as accomplices and associates (old news): The DC time, Berlusconi today.
Their (and not only them), "gap" policy is always the same, to partitocratica matrix in the pure sense that leads us to consider the "Party" is not half, but ... FINE, diaphragm, bureaucracy, the party that "teaches" that "form" cages that the ideas and individuals in their own flesh and ideological ideologizzante, individuals and ideas in short storage.
They are anthropologically related to certain models, for some consideration of the individual and society, relationships and the "conflict" social which is diametrically opposed to that radical. Despite
proclaim to be the future of the left etc etc etc, in fact, then when it comes to pass by the empty statements (perhaps in some convention by which we seek to rewrite their history and even those of their antagonists, including those radical handling operations in which they are experts as well as well-armed ... long story .... ;-) I avoid), the battle for political action and stutter ... and blather on the only thing I think they are experts: the "profession of faith" antiberlusconiana, only "axis" which revolves around their "proposed" policy, their ... "Units" ... er. ;-)
Then you know .. every faith that he respects his sins ... his confessions and his acquittal, the rites are the same and the "high priests" idem, matryoshkas a party matryoshka.
I'm tempted to compare their "attempts" to be delivered from these deposits to the image of a turkey trying to take flight, were it not that (all things), I am inclined to recognize more intellectual honesty in a turkey aquilesche animated by wishful thinking: they are what can only be seen that the party is their only reason of life, the only one that justifies their actions and their ... survival (along with the plethora of bureaucracies and systems that surround them are the "armed wing" sindacatocratico, the chaos of associations funded by the revenue, etc etc etc..) In short, not "late, opportunism, hypocrisy, pro-clerical, but SYSTEM, Church of the regime.
... it lacks the wings of freedom ....
but ... "We pass to another" I do not think Berlusconi
;-) is a siren for the radicals, believe that it is simply a fraud, that is, not what it says it is not a liberal. Point. I think this is now fact.
And I think this for some time:
The "new" parties born in the last decade, and among these, those of a so-called "liberal" does not actually have any marked interruption than their predecessors. Forza Italy, by the descent in the field of national Silvio in 1994, seemed to be the interpreter of a reform project, in fact pursuing for years, inexorably, a very dangerous act of regime preservation, anti-referendum and of itself, sublime and undisputed, forgery of liberal ideals, the CDL and its leader are an expression of the worst clerical-fascist right claiming to adherence to liberalism, then in fact cheating, behavior and choices in the idea of \u200b\u200bfreedom. So it was, is and, I fear, will be on presidentialism, federalism, liberalism and the majority. In fact, Berlusconi is the homogeneous regime, complicit with it and it has bankrolled.
The litmus test of that forgery is the Khomeini and total aversion to any libertarian approach, from the revaluation of clerical positions on abortion, family, euthanasia, from fideistic and demagogic positions on immigration, security and drugs. Yet it is should be emphasized that this right is succeeding in making the field of economic freedoms and the same counterfeiting operation sellout (see the story of the pension reform), that the left has made and is making terrreno on civil liberties: the whole covered by a conformity regime that clearly wants to continue to steal the people's sovereignty.
The data characterizing this phase of Italian politics is this: the falsification of ideas and the inauthenticity of political actors, and of course, economic, social and institutional.
Liberalism, presidentialism, federalism, reform (the ones with the "R" capital "of the bicameral memory), more I've been flattered and pampered, the more they are corrupted, betrayed, deprived. It 'clear that, in fact, those reforms are afraid. And their fear is grounded in the same ethnic reflected in recent years has led and leads the party politics to fight the referendum. This is their one and only "unity": the conservation of the system partitocratico.
In this context, it is clear that the radical and obscene battle, so forced off-stage "from the main channels of communication media: certainly not the case, certainly not for radical responsibility, but only because it is the same freedom, the same state of law, such certainty that are obscene to our country.
Here, says Marco Pannella, the need for radical, the need for radical practice of dialogue, we can play against the likely also with regard to the fate of Berlusconi and Prodi, here is the "secular" radical dialogue with all the rejection of false schematics (or here or there), own a media-political-institutional mad that sees only ethnic
in protecting its own raison d'etre.
is the need of the Rose in the Fist, there is the need of the "dream" radical, here is the necessity of revolutionary struggle, of resistance and partisan democratic, liberal, nonviolent, just like 90, 50, 30 or 10 years ago, the need short of the "revolution" radical, which is nothing more for our country that "recognize himself," as some would say, avoid giving the history of a nation other autobiographies such as fascism and post-fascism are states. So I do not
divisions among radical pro-CDL or from those pro-Olive, I side because this is not right and this left, both are our enemies, until at least continue to occur and to be conservative regime.
November 27, 2006
0 comments:
Post a Comment