Sunday, January 18, 2009

Lost License Will Bars Accept Paper

Canon RAI: \u200b\u200bI am exhausted! Nunzio Dibiase

I am going again this year with a heavy heart, to pay this pirate even legitimate contribution to the pockets of people whose work, from my personal point of view, consists mainly in breaking the boxes to the citizens, with respect, not so in disguise, to manipulate information and consciousness or, as such, and pouring out filth ignorance claiming to be something. Handsomely bribed people, thanks to my personal contribution, and certain times "for nothing party."
not take it anymore!
Sure, I can freely decide not to watch channels RAI, as well as I can freely decide not to go to the movies or on vacation somewhere, but with the difference that the free decision not to go to the cinema involves a) for my pocket a profit (in terms of savings), whether large or small, and b) helps to make the "market" (in the sense that, for example, if a bad writer, bad director, a bad actor, bring into service a crap movie, as a result of my decision and that of hundreds of thousands of other people, they are forced to change jobs, finding one that best suits your work skills and professional).
For the RAI does not happen: in spite of myself, by law and under the threat of further harassment and economic pain in the ass, I have to pay for programs that do not like what I think poor, who do not watch (or watch only if a prey to bouts of self-harm, with the express purpose of deliberately hurt me) who want to pouring out viewpoints that do not share, who want to manipulate consciences, which give information of some hideously , leading to the homes of stress and a climate of perpetual malaise.
are forced to pay, sacrificing even the purchase of some good books for me and my family, on salaries or attendance fees prebends "golden" for people and professionals, if they would rather compete on the open market, likely, the ability to measure, in their pockets, the validity of its products and the level of consensus their own ideas. But this is intended
people "by law" to live well, sometimes well, sometimes even to become a millionaire (in euros) at the expense of others, willingly or not, the latter.
I'm not saying that the reason is on my side and from the wrong side of those who do not agree or do not like: I say just do not want to pay for services for people who shit in my opinion, are (characters) in the negative and the grace received.
Why, in times of unbridled globalization, one can not subject the company RAI, or some of its programs, rules and judged by the market?
Because, at least, if you really do not could do without the fee, do not hang around the neck of many pundits, commentators (including the beautiful and long legs), phrase-, newspaper, tenants, guests, etc.., also paid with my contribution, a card with the amount of salary, compensation, dell'onorario or token received?
Why not subtitled programs with both total and partial costs of transmission and of each stage?
is public or not?
Not that I want to do business not mine, but I think I have the right to know how, to whom and to what extent are dished out the money, me and millions of other citizens could be called "Operation Transparency and information at this time would also help to better understand the views and coherence, human and professional, some of these, our well-paid "employees of fact." January 18, 2009

Nunzio Dibiase
PS: a courtesy, I ask the kind and patient readers who would comment negatively the article (should say "venting"): I will not be to talk about democracy and the protection of pluralism in this country ... in Italy, does not stand up! Here, to pay for everything and everything is always the same: depending on your point of view: good citizens, the most poor, those who can not do without it, the more fools!
Source: http://www.circolopoliticopitagora.it (Circle Political Pythagoras Bernalda)

0 comments:

Post a Comment